Local reporting needs more energy

In general, it seems that the American electorate is just barely well informed enough to be considered “free and self-governing,” as described in the article from class. I think that there is a significant percentage of the population that makes it a point to be as informed as possible, but a great majority of people that do not. I hope that these groups balance each other out, but I fear that I am being too optimistic.

For this week’s assignment, I looked at the coverage in the Star Tribune, Pioneer Press, and MinnPost. In regards to the questions posed and the issue of energy, including gas and price, I think all of the publications can make improvements on the way in which they inform the public about these issues in preparation for the November presidential elections.

Some of the key points of information I would need to have on this issue, would include specifics on the voting record of the nominees on energy related bills, a breakdown of their financial contributors with ties to energy-related companies, their stance on drilling for oil in protected areas, and details their long-term energy plan. It would also be essential to have a proper grasp of where the country stands in relation to energy now and who the major stakeholders are.

In the Star Tribune, for example, there is consistent coverage of the price of oil and the related fluctuations, but little intensive reporting on the voting records on energy-related bills and renewable energy options. This gap leaves voters at a disadvantage. If they don’t know the basics of the issues, distracting minutia will override. I am looking forward to more information and hearing what they have to say in the debates.