Wednesday, December 3, 2008

Further input on why Islands of Quality will be necessary:

How journalism will evolve: partisan, paid for, geared towards the professional.
Continuing from last week:

Further input on why Islands of Quality will be necessary:

I think it is important to note this is blogging by professional journalists, not Citizen Journalism.

Mossberg got the most appreciative response of the panel during a discussion about citizen journalism: "It's like citizen surgery!" said
Mossberg.
http://reportr.net/2007/05/31/the-space-between-professional-and-citizen-journalism/?referer=sphere_related_content/
Getting into an argument about who is a professional journalist and whether so-called citizen journalism is good or bad for the profession is a dead-end discussion. There is room for both.
More interesting are comments by Herrmann on the BBC Editors’ blog on how the phenomenon of social media - blogs, stories and pictures from the audience, and interactivity in general, has affected BBC journalism:
Two key strands of our day-to-day journalism – readers’ comments and opinions, and newsgathering based on information from the audience – have become an indispensable part of what we do, and talked about some of the logistical and editorial challenges this presents.


http://reportr.net/2008/11/26/insights-into-why-bbc-journalists-blog/


Insights into why BBC journalists blog
November 26, 2008 in BBC, blogs, broadcast, journalism, social media
Tags: BBC, Robert Peston, Nick Robinson
One of my research interests is blogs at the BBC, so I was fascinated by the tweets coming from Paul Bradshaw and Dan Bennett on the session on blogging at the internal Future of Journalism conference organised by the BBC’s College of Journalism.
Bradshaw outlined the BBC blogs rules: authenticity, single author, impartiality, comments, commitment and obeying the rules of the blogosphere.
By all accounts, the star of the session was the BBC’s business editor and influential blogger Robert Peston. His blog had almost 8 million page views in October.
The BBC’s Jem Stone has posted his notes from Peston’s talk on his blog. Among the highlights from Peston’s comments:
I do see the blog as the absolute cornerstone of the way that I work. It’s central to everything that I do at the BBC.
The enormous personal benefits are you get to know a load of stuff that you can’t use in a 2-3 minute package on the Ten. Getting out detail that you can’t get into anywhere else is fantastic.
It also reasserts your ownership and authority when it comes to a story.
The comments are quite challenging and interesting and often generate ideas about where to go with a story.
All the standards I apply to my blog are the standards I apply to any other bit of my broadcasting.
I wouldn’t overstate the risks with blogs. Any time a reporter goes on the BBC News channel or Today programme, there is a huge risk in a two way. At least with the written word you will read it over a few times.At least you get a second pair of eyes. I assume there are many more checks and balances than with most “lives”. I think the reputational risks are diminished.
Perhaps what is most remarkable about this session is that blogs are a relative new innovation at the BBC. The first truly official blog by a journalist was launched in December 2005 by Nick Robinson. Now the corporation has more than 80 blogs, almost half of them by journalists.
It has come a long way since a BBC columnist wrote in 2003:
Blogging is not journalism. Often it is as far from journalism as it is possible to get, with unsubstantiated rumour, prejudice and gossip masquerading as informed opinion.

BBC NEWS | dot.life | Twitter - the Mumbai myths
"What Twitter has done is to provide instant information about anything that is happening near its millions of users, coupled with a brilliant way of sharing that information. What it doesn't do is tell us what is true and what isn't - and that makes the work of mainstream media outlets and professional reporters all the more relevant."
(tags: twitter BBC citizenjournalism web_2.0 UGC)

No comments: